Sredharan Metair: Oran, birth of a heritage consciousness

The introduction of the texts of the speakers at the meeting of 2 March 2013 in Venice (see the presentation of the meeting and see the texts already online) continues. Here is the text of the speech by Sredharan Metair, president of the Bel Horizon Association in Oran. Why and how to involve the inhabitants and heritage communities in the cultural heritage and with what results? The experience of the Bel Horizon Association in Oran, Algeria. The heritage consciousness is very recent in Algeria. The Law on the protection of the heritage, Law 98/04, was promulgated in 1998 and the decrees of application in 2003. Meanwhile, our country has lost whole parts of its heritage. Before that, heritage defenders were recruited into journalists, architects and some elites only.  But in the absence of adequate legal framework, their action remained limited. The most edifying example was the construction, in the years 80, of a 17-storey building in the heart of a classified heritage site, located in the city centre, with the concurrence of the Ministry of Culture, in charge of heritage protection! Today, 30 years later, this unfinished, concrete carcass still sits in this site that has completely deteriorated! The urban restructuring, bulldozed, demolished, in record time, what the elders took centuries to build. Old Oran, a historic city, is fallow and looks like a neighborhood that has been bombarded. With the beginning of the democratic opening of the years 90, heritage protection associations or NGOs were born. They have contributed significantly to the dissemination of heritage culture and to the awareness of citizens and public authorities, based on provisions of law 98/04, which open up good prospects for intervention to civil society: Article 91 any legally constituted association proposing by its statutes to act for the Protection of Cultural property may be a civil party in respect of offences under this Act. Moreover, Article 17: (...) The monuments are subject to the order of the minister responsible for culture after the opinion of the National Commission of Cultural Property, on his own initiative or any other person having interest. However, despite this progress, our country suffers from a particular problem, namely that heritage heritage is not shared for ideological reasons. Indeed: Our country has an exceptional heritage stratification: a prehistoric period of more than 100 000 years, Phoenician, Roman, Byzantine, Arab-Muslim, Ottoman, Spanish, French, but this richness is not perceived As such, since it was the product of a story, certainly rich, but tumultuous and complex. A history punctuated, for centuries, by wars, conquests and extremely violent colonizations. Therefore our perception of the heritage in Algeria is not common: are the monuments reminiscent of the French period considered, by all, as National heritage? We take this example because it is a recent history with a very large number of monuments and other remarkable buildings. Law 98/04 has come to propose a shared conception of the heritage as a whole, since article 2 specifies: Under this law, the cultural heritage of the nation is considered to be all property culturelsimmobiliers, real estate by Destination and existing furniture on and in the soil of the buildings of the national domain, belonging to natural persons or legal entities of private law, as well as in the basement of the national inland and territorial waters bequeathed by the various Civilizations that have succeeded from prehistory to the present day. This common perception, advocated by the law, allows us to envisage the appropriation of the heritage as a whole, whether it be the inheritance of colonization or otherwise! We have offered to give visibility to this Oran heritage, whose characteristic is to be a stratified heritage, diversified but unfortunately, again, not yet totally shared:

  • Prehistory:
  • Antique:
  • Arab Muslim:
  • Spanish:
  • Ottoman:
  • French:

It is from this observation and from this legal framework that we have undertaken, over the last 10 years, an awareness-raising work in the direction of young people, in particular and of the general population:

  • Through the training of young heritage and city guides (3 promotions of 20 young people each time),
  • By a work of inventory of historic sites and monuments, followed by the publication of a guide to historic sites and monuments,
  • Through the organization of workshops on the subjectivity of heritage and the layout of patrimonial circuits,
  • And finally the creation of several thematic circuits, adapted to the target audiences and to the different communities:, female landmarks of the heritage Oran, remarkable tree circuits, sites and historical monuments, landmarks Camusiens and Roblésiens, Architecture of the twentieth Art Deco and Neo-Moorish etc.

But the brand of our association remains the hiking on the heritage circuits. Organized once a month, with an average of one hundred participants, the heritage hike takes a spectacular look the may1 of each year, with thousands of participants and in a large social mix.  This mass activity is wanted spectacular to precisely strike the imagination and arouse the wonder of being together, to discover together what can bring back the heritage in terms of improving the environment of life and desire to "live together"! All of these actions have helped to involve the communities in gradually appropriating their heritage in its entirety. The public authorities are announcing real prospects of taking over old Oran. We propose to accompany these actions, through the mobilization of the communities, to ensure that the heritage serves also and above all the cultural needs of these populations and avoid the tendency to want to muséifier these heritage spaces. In conclusion, we can say that the heritage awareness has been affirmed at all levels. Heritage associations exist throughout the country and are organized in the form of networks, one of which has been animated by our association for the last ten years and which we have called "plural inheritances".  We also fully adhere to the objectives of the Faro Convention, hoping that one day we can organize a meeting like this in Oran. A whole program! Sredharan Metair, Venice, March 2013

Daniel Thérond: The Faro Convention, heritage and change management

Following the signing of the Faro Convention by the Italian state, Hotel du Nord continues to put online the texts of the speakers at the meeting of 2 March 2013 in Venice (see the presentation of the meeting and see the texts already online). Here is the text of the communication of Daniel Therond, Secretary of the Drafting Committee of the Faro Convention and former head of the Department of Culture, Heritage and diversity at the Council of Europe. Offering an updated view of the heritage the Convention to which Italy has just acceded supplements the previous major texts of the Council of Europe and UNESCO on cultural property. This text resituates heritage as a response to the expectations and needs of citizens ' well-being in advanced democracies. It highlights the party that can be drawn from the heritage to improve the quality of the living environment of the inhabitants while promoting a strengthening of the social bond. As a framework Convention, Faro is a site of reflection and experience that it will be up to each country to develop according to its specificities. However, a very specific illumination of the text is due to the "bottom up" approach suggested with the concept of "heritage community", which carries initiatives and public engagement. The new construction of the heritage promoted by Faro is based on four pillars:

  •  The perception of heritage not as an end in itself but as a useful resource to society;
  • Access to and use of heritage as a practice of human rights experienced by citizens;
  • The shared responsibility of all towards this heritage and the diversification of its actors;
  • The direction of the heritage economy towards sustainable development of the Territories.

Heritage as a resource Faro adopts a definition that exceeds the traditional compartmentalization of material and intangible, buildings and objects. It is a "resource" expression of "values, beliefs, knowledge and traditions in continual evolution". Far from being only retrospective the lead of the heritage continues over time. For the first time also a convention defines the "common heritage of Europe", as the product of successive strata having characterized the territories. It is the whole of these strata in all their aspects, whatever the origin and the vicissitudes, which today form the heritage of a certain place.  Perhaps it is precisely the diversity of such a resource and all its facets that may have spawned in time the creativity of the territories up to the present. Faro also encompasses in the common heritage of Europe the ideals of principles and values that have led to human rights, democracy and the rule of law. This unprecedented political reference to the traditional definition of cultural property was controversial in the drafting of the text. However, the relevance of the text is better understood when one thinks of a world news involving violence and resurgences of obscurantism. The use of heritage resources and the exercise of human rights in the extension of fundamental rights, the fact that every person can be recognized in one or more heritages is the right to participate in the cultural life recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the increasingly recognized right of the jurisprudence to benefit from a better environment.  Every person (article 4) must "respect the cultural heritage of others as well as their own heritage and consequently the common heritage of Europe".  The article on "Cultural Heritage and dialogue" innovates in an instrument of this type by referring to methods of intercultural interpretation of property and to a conciliation process where contradictory values are Attributed to the same heritage by various communities. Thus heritage becomes a pedagogical tool that can contribute to a culture of living together: far from fuelling the exacerbations of identity it can promote the awareness by people of the multi-cultural affiliation of many territories and their inhabitants. Shared responsibility and the diversification of actors the concept of a "heritage community", not to be enclosed within ethnic or linguistic boundaries, embodies the exercise of the right to heritage on the ground. It reflects the involvement of people sharing the same interests in the identification, conservation, valorisation and dissemination of heritage approaches. The initiatives born spontaneously in Venice and Marseille illustrate the importance of heritage communities who intend to invest in the development of the potential of the territory's resources. Examples are multiplying in other countries, particularly in the case of industrial wastelands and large equipment of the 19th and 20th centuries calling for reconversion. Faro is the first international text (cf. Title III) describing the indispensable combined action of a range of actors (public authorities, investors, property owners, private companies, professional circles and associations). The growing share of the contribution of private investors and the associative world does not, of course, make the role of the public authorities responsible for the general interest and the setting of the rules of the game obsolete. Public/private collaborations and the balance between the involvement of experts and public participation, the role of public officials and the commitment of civil society are the challenges of a new set of Policies and heritage practices. The diversification of roles and modes of intervention is obviously linked to the heritage economy. Deepening the debate on a diversified heritage economy long regarded as an unproductive burden heritage has been seen for decades as a source of benefits from tourism and a set of cultural industries. Studies on the direct and indirect effects of investment in heritage and its multiplier effects are numerous. However, it would be possible to refine the reflection because it cannot have a single vision and apply the same recipes to different and complex situations such as: the management of urban centres and habitat, the management of very frequented major monuments or the Otherwise insufficiently frequented, very diversified activities entering the meaning of Faro in the wide family of heritage such as crafts, the arts of the table, gastronomy, fashion, or even the popular arts and traditions or the Carnival. Because of their nature and meanings certain types of heritage entails constraints of protection, respect for authenticity and a large proportion of public funding while other elements can live with constraints of protection Less or even without legal protection and from largely private funding and volunteer support. There is a role everywhere for heritage communities, on the understanding that in some cases this role is all the more decisive because there is a lack of support for public budgets because there is no means. Solutions and partnerships are actually building on a case-by-case basis. Faro's follow-up involves a valuable international exchange of experiences ("benchmarking") that can help to identify and better understand the strategy of cross-financing and informative transposable of partnership. The sustainable use of the heritage potential of the territories could put the main emphasis on the prospects for the growth of cultural tourism in the hundreds of millions of new potential visitors from countries Both the heritage and the landscapes of Europe keep attractive. There is no need here to dwell on a development choice that would make certain parts of Europe a huge amusement park after relocation of almost all other production activities… It is an otherwise ambitious vision that underlies the Convention by inserting the heritage into as broad a perspective as possible of land-use planning and endogenous development. It is obvious that we must bring Faro closer to the European landscape Convention (Florence 2000), both of which are part of a territorial regeneration perspective involving not only tourism activities and their direct, indirect effects and induced but a real diversification of economic activities drawing on "territorial intelligence", knowledge and know-how of regions and cities and calls for the experience of any other alternative model of sustainable development and Solidarity economy that promotes employment. It is the interest of articles 8 to 10 of the Convention to underline principles of sustainable use of resources such as the importance of maintenance, respect for heritage values in the case of adaptation and conversion of goods, the insertion of needs Conservation in the technical regulations of general scope, the promotion of the use of ancient materials and techniques and the exploration of their contribution in contemporary production, finally the maintenance of a high level of Qualification by the procedures of qualification and accreditation of persons or companies. Article 13 stresses the major role of training and the transmission of know-how which is a "sine qua non" condition of the heritage future. European cooperation in this area remains a need to be met on-line, moreover, with the work initiated in Venice from the years 70 by the Council of Europe with its experimental Centre for the training of craftsmen and the networks initiated at that time.  The promotion of the image of trades and their economic and social utility remains, in all cases, an imperative of local development. Through several articles emphasizing the strengthening of access to heritage as a central objective, Faro also addresses the issues of the use of digital technologies (article 14) both in terms of content quality, Linguistic diversity, prevention of illicit traffic in cultural property and free access to information. These subjects call for work on ethics and deontology which would have its place in an effective monitoring of the Convention. Such follow-up remains to be put in place to promote the development of the momentum created by the innovative text of the Council of Europe on the ground. It is legally up to the signatory States to specify their forms under the auspices of the Council of Europe.  However, it is not doubtful that regions and cities as well as civil society will have a practical role to play, for example, when we keep in mind the spontaneous experiences in Marseille and Venice around the "message of Faro".  Thematic projects could thus be launched and pursued through networks of European partners willing to invest in them. Without any exhaustiveness come in particular in mind: the comparative study of local development activities based on the sustainable use of heritage resources; The experience of new audiences (Cf. "Northern Hotel"); The Vitality of crafts and heritage in the competitiveness of the Territories; The quality of content of digital products using heritage support; The evolution of professional profiles and the expert/public relationship. But many other entries would be taken into account as the evolution of the idea of heritage emerged from Faro. In conclusion, Venice had welcomed in 1964 the drafting of the basic text of the ICOMOS Charter on architectural Conservation. With the signing of the Faro Convention and this colloquium, Italy is actively contributing to a revival of the debate on the role of heritage in a changing society that seeks benchmarks and reasons for hope. If the concept of heritage did not exist for a long time, it would have to be invented today, as it is important for the understanding and acceptance of the diversity of our societies, for the commitment of creative projects and social networks that they Engender, and finally to put into practice concrete initiatives of "sustainable" development for the benefit of the greatest number in a more optimistic and humane Europe. Daniel Therond, Venice, March 2013.  

Pascale Raju: The experience of the municipal heritage Commission of the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille

We continue to put online the texts of the speakers at the meeting of 2 March 2013 in Venice following the signing of the Faro Convention by the Italian state (see the presentation of the meeting and see the texts already online). Here is the text of the speech of Raju, deputy delegate for culture, Marseille European Capital of culture and new Technologies. President of the Heritage Commission 15/16. Ladies and gentlemen, following our election in March 2008, I made a diagnosis of territory. Very quickly it became clear that the heritage issue was a fundamental issue for our sector. The work that Mrs. Christine BRETON had done, which we have just heard, has allowed many people to seize this issue. The creation of the heritage Commission, at the request of Mrs Samia GHALI, allowed us to organise all these energies scattered throughout our territory. The Commission shall be composed of:

  • of neighbourhood associations,
  • of independent artists,
  • of cultural associations,
  • Of professional art companies,
  • of business leaders,
  • of cultural mediators,
  • of social workers.

I'm the president, surrounded by the municipal Employees of the Culture department. The first two years we met one morning a month. The themes were numerous and varied. I'll quote you a few.

  • Classification and registration of places, buildings, conservation measure,
  • File deposit as "the soap route" with the MP13 Association,
  • Backing of Vasarely's paintings,
  • Preservation and development of the natural Heritage (Mourepiane, Nerthe, Hill consolate, Cascade Aygalades).

We have had great successes like the ranking of the station of the ESTA, the progress on many dossiers concerning the natural heritage. In our committee, we are experimenting with the conflicting dimension of heritage because it is a place of mediation. In fact, contradictory interests are expressed in a democratic space. The decisions we make are always in the interest of the greatest number. This Commission acts as a mediator between the various bodies to which the heritage communities are confronted: City of Marseille, regional Directorate for Cultural Actions, Communauté Urbaine de Marseille, Marseille Provence 2013. So the locals get answers because they have their interlocutor in front of them. We dedicate 3 to 4 committees to prepare the European municipalities heritage Days, which are the highlight of our annual work. In fact, during these three days, we organize a dozen heritage walks, expos, the book fair, lectures, etc. It is necessary to know, and this is extraordinary, that in 2012, it is 6000 people who participated in these days European municipalities of the heritage of the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille. When we know the history of the northern neighbourhoods, the bad reputation that sticks to its inhabitants, believe me it is a wonder. During these three days, Marseille discover that in this pool of dwellings of 100 000 souls, there are unsung, protected and sometimes splendid natural places. They also discover the economic dynamism (soapy of the Midi, Arnavaux) and cultural (city of the street Arts). And especially the greatest richness of this territory to know its inhabitants. Not only are they the custodians of the industrious past of Marseille but their sense of hospitality, hospitality and sharing are remarkable. It is for them, to highlight them, that we had the idea to create a network of bed and breakfasts. I will let you guess the sarcasm that this project has aroused! "Welcoming tourists to the northern neighbourhoods what a joke!" Well let me tell you, dear listeners, that today this network of bed and breakfast organized by the Coopérative Hotel du Nord is a great success! associated with MP13, distributed by the Guide to the backpacker, Hotel du Nord is an example of alternative economic development. Finally, the heritage Commission of the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille was able to model its functioning, to share it with two other district councils, soon three and the town hall of Trolles (40 000 inhabitants). As such, we are responsible by the Council of Europe and the European Commission for preparing part of the debates which will take place next September at the European heritage Forum. You think that I would never have imagined doing such prestigious actions. But what touches me the most is to be here, in Venice, in front of you. I who came from a popular family, coming for half, from the mountains of Barbagia in Sardinia; It is because Mrs Samia GHALI and I grew up in these quarters, that we know the bitter taste of humiliation, that we understood the issue of integrated heritage. We have been inspired by this concept to restore the dignity of the inhabitants and we have succeeded. I am happy to share this pride with you. Grazie per il vostro. Pascale Raju, Venice March 2013

Christine Breton: The Faro Convention a chance for heritage communities stuck between small social war fronts and museums

Hotel du Nord continues to put online the texts of the speakers at the meeting of 2 March 2013 in Venice following the signing of the Faro Convention by the Italian state (see the presentation of the meeting and see the texts already online).  Hotel du Nord publishes the text of the intervention of Christine Breton curator Emeritus of Heritage and member of the Coopérative Hotel du Nord "Heritage communities between small social war fronts and museums". Let us lay our heritage and the dominant model of the museum. This large white international cube can also be a local museum. It is an accumulator of décontextués objects and thus a great Baroque poem to the glory of the scientist in his laboratory, Master of the world and of the colonies. For society such a model enters into the category of collective utopias based on the Tabula rasa, shaved tables invented by modernity, glorious or criminal. The reference Museum embodies the National Corps, everywhere in Europe and France, as soon as the revolution in 1792. It's a foundation story. Narrative today obsolete when nations fédérent in Europe, when decolonization restores its cultural property in context if possible, when wealth is made in micro-seconds. We no longer need the museum, it is an inherited work, a historical monument-Totologie of isolation. Now let's ask the reality of heritage communities. The social body is embodied in all the inherited symbolic data. The museum has the power over the symbolic and it fascinates so much. An absolute power of life and death on all traces of collective memory, the museum decides what is in or out of history. Making a museum today after the severe criticism built against this obsolete model is due to the will of personal power or ignorance. Ignore that in France, for example, the same man, Jules Ferry, creates the organization of compulsory primary education and that of museums and that he was also the champion of colonization. -How to be in our social present? At the time of this question, we moved to the world history, we reversed the historical contexts. It's time for the unseen. Then begins to shine, in the distance, everything that was excluded from the great national narrative. Begins to twinkle anything that is not referenced, muséifié or part of the Nation. Appear the missing of the stellar night, the ghosts wandering away from our collective novel, those who had so well loved Walter Benjamin by walking in the streets of Berlin or Marseille. Then the time turns and the reference shifts to the excluded third-quivering of the reason. How did the social Corps react? I often hear him scolding behind my back, when we walk through the neighborhoods of Marseille, when we pass a small social war front. They scold, uncomfortable in physical contact with violent urban exclusion. And here it is still the museum model that comes back in protection in the face of this ascent of collective repression: sensation of zoo or museumification of the city. A sensation that only refers to oneself, to its knowledge as power; Surprised in the uncultivated life. So I am assured that this city that we are thinking with our feet, collectively in the walk, does not get along. I perceive in my back their profound emotion, their inner debate which temporarily muted them-social deadlock. Perhaps this is the museum of the 21st Century: the ability to perceive the graft-museum in itself, in the organic itself. The violent disorder she creates. The decision to get away from it, to accept the inability to understand so much the concepts are still immature and yet perceive the formidable thrust alive as soon as we let go everything to go to the desert of knowledge. The social body falls into a collective practice of knowledge and memories. An ecological practice, contextuée. -end of the colonies, beginning of the work of the heritage communities on the ground of the living daily. American Anthropologist Timothy Ingold sums up this contextual triple Salto: "in itself, information is not a knowledge, and its accumulation does not make us more learned." Our ability to know is more about the possibility that we have to situate such information, to understand its meaning, within a context of perceptual relations, live with our environments. And I argue that we are developing that capability as long as we are being shown. " So let's walk to the desert of the museum following the resident there to show us. We are collectively developing our perceptual relations with the small social war fronts made so violent by invisibility and the deafening silence prevailing. -Possibility of contexts. Christine Breton Honorary curator of Heritage Venice March 2013. Christine Breton Curator Emeritus of Heritage, she has been responsible for public collections at the Musée de Grenoble (1974-1983), the regional funds of Rhône Alpes and Provence (1984-1987). Curator in charge of mission to the city of Marseille from 1987 to 2010 she created the programs of workshops of artists, exhibitions and urban artistic commissions; In collaboration with the Council of Europe she experimented 1996, with the inhabitants, the integrated approach of the heritage in the 15-16th arrondissements of Marseille. Doctor of History in 1981, she was invited to many art schools, design and art history institutes; From 1988 to 1995 associate professor at the University of Aix-Marseille. At retirement, she continues her historical and heritage research. Selective bibliography

  •  Berrit 83, exhibitions in and out of museum, Musée de Grenoble,1983;
  • Fragments of collections for the memory of a city, Le Luc en Provence, FRAC Provence, 1985;
  • The gallery of the Sea, city of Marseille,1987-1995, 7 issues on art and the city;
  • Integrated heritage approach, shared valuation of heritage, conflicting value of heritage, such as Salmon, Prince of the Curious and hermit collection Exos, AGCCPF, 2004 – 2010;
  •  School of the Daughters of Saint-André, Marseille, 1998-2005;
  • Südraum-Konferenz, Leipzig, 2004;
  • Nord Hotel/Tales of hospitality, 8 issues with Martine Derain, Joint editions, Marseille, 2010-2012.

Jean Cristofol: The North

The question arose to welcome guests in northern Hotel, who would like to join us and whose habitats are located in other arrondissements of Marseille, but also in towns of the Lake of Leo and the area of Fos. This forces us to think about the geographical boundaries in which North Hotel fits. It also forces us to reflect on the necessary development of our activities to achieve a minimum balance that allows the economic survival of our co-op – and hopefully its self-development. Of course, the two aspects are linked, but they also have to respond to a genuine need and coherence that gives them meaning. The North hotel is anchored in the reality of the northern districts of Marseille. It is the product of a clean history that has long enrolled in the fifteenth and sixteenth arrondissements. This makes two territories which only partially overlap and which must be distinguished: the territory which has received the birth of an experiment and which is also defined within its institutional limits, and the territory which bears the spirit and the reason of this experience and which does not stop at administrative cuttings. It is these two territories that Northern Hotel Bears in its name, and which it must know to reinvent the relations both imaginary and geographical. What carries the Northern Hotel co-operators is a certain way of seizing the reality of the places and the tensions that work on them to feed interlaced projects where common values are articulated: The meeting, the reception and the hospitality, the Willingness to value territories beyond the clichés that overwhelm them, the idea that history lives only in the present creation, the belief that the economy can reinvent itself in the relationship to culture. And what characterizes these places and their tensions is the economic and political process that created Marseille's destiny by dividing the city profoundly, by opposing the north and the south, by denying the richness of its popular heritage, by creating areas of Social segregation, by making oblivion and contempt a weapon of moral destruction that presides over the reproduction of forms of morbid power, unable to think about the future. Of course, the North Hotel is certainly not in itself an answer to this process, but it finds its backdrop and it draws in the need to resist its first energy. So what we call the northern districts is not just a perimeter or a territory of belonging, but a certain point of view. This point of view is both the one from which they are viewed and the one they offer us as a place of a glance at the world. In a way, North Hotel is proposing to work these viewpoints and the way they intersect. It would also be a curiously simplifying idea to think that the northern districts are a territory. They cover an incredible wealth of different territories. And this diversity of territories, of populations, of stories and of traditions, of languages also, is recognized in a space certainly very concrete, but always redesigned, always reinvented. There is, towards Corbières, a port structure of pleasure craft which asserts itself as a port of Marseille West. It is obviously a local way to avoid being in the north, it is a way of practicing a geography of denial. We have to practice a geography of the claim. That there are initiatives on the thirteenth and fourteenth arrondissements, it seems to me to be absolutely natural. In the logic of cross-points of view, I do not really see what distinguishes them from our quarters, even if the remoteness of the sea makes them cinematically less photogenic. The towns of the lake of Leo ask us a much more interesting question. They speak to us in short of the history of our neighbourhoods, between the extension of the urban fabric and the movement of industrial activities towards wider spaces, more open, more easily articulated on the maritime facade – the north. They also tell us about the contribution of immigrant populations, the cross between agricultural heritage and land-eating enterprises, between villages and cities, new towns and the restarted forms of the social crisis. They are different from us and they are us at the same time, our extensions, our expansions, our humble and poor Americas. They are our north and they are part of our north. We share the same story and the same present, because our respective territories have formed the same logic. That is why it seems necessary for me to continue and to deploy the North Hotel activity. Jean Cristofol, Associate North Hotel, November 2012.

Guillaume Cromer: From community tourism to the French

Photo credit: Guillaume Cromer [/caption] Guillaume Cromer is one of the experts who came to meet the Northern Hotel on August 18 as part of the responsible tourism trophies. Following this meeting, he published this article on his website SPE Tourisme. In the year 2000, the Swiss Cooperation agency Helvetas launched a community tourism project in the heart of Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, to promote the entire heritage of the Kyrgyz territory in favour of the economic reconstruction of the country. The concept called "CBT – Community-based tourism" in English is explained by the fact that this type of tourism project is based on the inhabitants or the local community. The latter manages and coordinates the entire tourism project. In Kyrgyzstan, in the four corners of the country, residents have gathered in local organizations to offer tourist benefits to national and international visitors. Thus, the shepherds, the housewives, the farmers, the artisans, the young, etc. Offered accommodation (in the inhabitant or under the yurt), mountain guidance (on foot or on horseback), restoration, local handicraft in the form of souvenir objects or cultural services. Thus, based on all the local heritages (equestrian culture, local gastronomy, mountain landscapes and steppes, handicrafts, historical monuments, history of the elders and shepherds, etc.) and valuing them around benefits Tourists, these inhabitants were able to improve the image of a country of the former Soviet Union while improving their daily living conditions and creating jobs for the young people of the villages. Showtime Eleven years later, the project is a great success. It becomes impossible for a traveller to take an unstamped "CBT" service. All the tourist guides have highlighted the CBT offer in their publications. In Kyrgyzstan, more than 20 villages have created their local CBT antenna. The National Association KCBTA (Kyrgyz Community based Tourism Association) based in the capital Bishkek coordinates the local antennas, organizes a la carte circuits for international tour operators and travels on the major tourism fairs in Europe and Asia. Finally, the project has made small ones in neighbouring countries, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, based on the heritage and identities of each territory. Recently Uneassociation of Community tourism in Central Asia, bringing together all these entities has even been created. On January 1, 2011, closer to home, in Marseille, a cooperative company "Hôtel du Nord" was created to offer travellers accommodation at home, participatory walks in the northern districts of the cité Marseille and the sale of Local products (Marseille soap, locally refined goat cheese, books and publications featuring local heritage, etc.) exclusively from the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille. Based on the heritage (natural, cultural, built, historical, human) of these neighbourhoods, the members and friends of the cooperative decided to restore the image of the northern districts of the city making, without knowing it, a true community tourism to The French. The traveller can thus meet the inhabitants of these neighbourhoods, to understand their fights, their difficulties, their joys and their fears and to follow their projects which aim to preserve their living environment, to improve the life of all the inhabitants, to give Desires for young people or simply to share good moments of conviviality around a stew or a pastis. The traveller will thus have the change to meet Michèle, Thérèse, Christine, Maxou or Rose, to spend a night in the district of La Mourepiane, of the Esta Cher to Cézanne or in the city of the visitation, to discover the traditional soap of Midi, of To meet Dominique the origin of an exceptional project of shared gardens in the sensitive city of Aygalades, reviving thus the social connections between the inhabitants and developing entrepreneurship and citizenship in the cities of the northern districts. Many exceptional projects are thus followed, supported and endorsed by the cooperative, which offers a new look at the northern areas of Marseille to the French travelers but also to the Marseille themselves discovering or rediscovering a neighbourhood Attaching to clichés far too attached…. Thus, as in Kyrgyzstan, the inhabitants of the 15th and 16th have regained a way of valuing their exceptional heritages in the service of local economic development of the inhabitants as well as for a positive opening of these neighborhoods to the eye Outside. A magnificent Citizen project, nominated in 2011 for the Voyages-sncf.com Trophy of responsible tourism in the category urban tourism. by Guillaume Cromer, on August 18, 2011

Prosper Wanner: The choice of the cooperative to exercise the right to cultural heritage.

The great plasticity of co-operative status has enabled it for more than a century to be an innovative and concrete response to societal issues: consumption, handicrafts, agriculture, fishing, banking, production and lately the collective interest. This was especially true when legislators crossed the cooperative movement at the Social Museum.

This plasticity is based on the strength of its founding principles, enunciated in England in the years 1840 by a group of Rochedale weavers, then taken up, supplemented and recently updated by the International cooperative Alliance.

This capacity for innovation, the UN will promote it in 2012 with the year "cooperatives, companies for a better world".

The question posed in this article is that of the co-operative's ability to respond to the Council of Europe's challenge to the Member States to recognise the right to cultural heritage.

The right to cultural heritage.

The right to participate freely in the cultural life of the community is recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Council of Europe has made it clear for cultural heritage by proposing to recognise to each person, alone or in common, the right to benefit from the cultural heritage and to contribute to its enrichment. That is to say as an example the right to designate what makes heritage for oneself, to take part in the choices of its development or to give its opinion on the use that is made, alone or in common.

The definition of heritage taken into account by the Council of Europe goes beyond the registered or classified patrimony that we know in France. It includes all aspects of our environment resulting from the interaction in time between people and places. This heritage is neither static nor immutable. On the contrary, our human action defines it and redefines it permanently. This approach does not separate the heritage of the human, it binds them.

It is a Copernican revolution that is proposed to States to think no more about the object to be protected – the heritage – but Ausujet beneficiary, namely any single person or in common. The Council of Europe is convinced of the need to involve everyone in the ongoing process of defining and managing cultural heritage.

It is a matter of initiating a process of democratization of the Heritage Factory. This approach is echoed by all those who see their heritage environment transformed, exploited, confiscated or abandoned.

Ten states agreed to progress together on the recognition of this right to cultural heritage. From this year 2011, they will begin their work on the basis of the objectives, areas of action and major directions of progress drawn up by the Council of Europe in its framework Convention on the value of cultural heritage for the so-called Convention Society Faro.

The choice of the North Hotel Co-op.

In Marseille, the future European capital of culture, citizens meeting in a cooperative, Hotel du Nord, have decided to give themselves the means to apply the principles laid down in this Faro Convention.

The social purpose of their cooperative is to enhance the heritage present in the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille to keep it "alive" and to improve the lives of those who live and work there. The inhabitants of the 15th and 16th arrondissement of Marseille are involved in the heritage.

To pursue its social object, the cooperative develops publishing activities, popular education through a host school and promotes hospitality: Bed and Breakfast, accompanists, shops, businesses, stays, artistic creations. Its purpose is to develop economic activity.

This cooperative is based on a diffuse network of residents, civil servants, associations, artists and business leaders who have been producing heritage for 15 years. The town hall of 15th and 16th arrondissements (8th sector) and the association Marseille-Provence 2013 are at their side.

The purpose of this article is to explain the reasons that led to the choice of co-operative status to create solidarity economy from this heritage wealth.

The cooperative principles, historically alive in the neighbourhoods concerned by a century and a half of working history, have served as the basis for reflection as to whether they were adaptable today for an application of the principles of the Faro Convention By the citizens. Only the practice and the invention of still unknown forms can tell us.

One member, one voice.

One of the demands of the inhabitants is to be associated with the governance of the heritages of their districts, in the middle of the period of industrial conversion. Hence their commitment to the recognition that everyone, alone or in common, has the right to benefit from the cultural heritage and to contribute to its enrichment.

This right is reflected in the Cooperative principles: voluntary and open-ended membership or the so-called "open door" principle and the democratic power exercised by members under the rule "one member, one vote". These principles make it possible to establish the framework of democratic governance of a heritage process: cooperatives are democratic organizations led by their members who actively participate in the development of policies and in the taking of Decisions.

A common heritage.

A second claim is that the economic valuation choices of these assets are part of a solidarity economy.

The Co-operative principle of economic participation of members is based on solidarity between members of the cooperative and with future generations. Each member of a cooperative is in solidarity with the others and the common heritage.

Throughout their existence, cooperatives constitute an undivided financial reserve. It is a collective property etinter generational that contributes to the sustainability of the cooperative. If the co-operative is dissolved, the reserve is allocated to another co-operative or to works of general interest. This principle has some similarity to the notion of inalienable property that characterizes registered and classified heritage.

A solidarity economy.

The cooperative is a company which, although no-profit, must develop economic activity to ensure its autonomy and its existence. This forces and commits to generate the economy on the 15th and 16th arrondissements of Marseille which strongly need it.

In a cooperative, the capital can be paid by a limited interest comparable to that of a loan. It is allowed to the extent that it does not fragile the common good. The cooperative helps to ensure that economic policies respect the integrity of the cultural heritage without compromising its intrinsic values.

A heritage community.

One of the other qualities of the co-operative is to be a possible form of heritage community, i.e. to bring together a group of people who value specific aspects of the cultural heritage they want, within the framework of Public action, maintain and transmit to future generations. The cooperative is positioned between the public sphere and the private one. It may enter into agreements with other private or public organisations if these agreements preserve the democratic power of the members and maintain their independence.

To strengthen this independence, cooperatives have committed in their history a great importance to provide their sociétairesl'éducation, training and information needed to be able to effectively contribute to the development of their Cooperative, although this is less topical today. This concerns the Council of Europe's concern as well as to foster an economic and social environment conducive to participation in activities relating to cultural heritage.

A common goal.

Finally, the Faro Convention calls on States to ensure that the conservation of cultural heritage and its sustainable use are aimed at human development and the quality of life. In 1995 the International Cooperative Alliance clearly reiterated the commitment of cooperatives towards the community and their contribution to sustainable development.

Towards a European cultural co-operative.

Although there is currently no legal cooperative heritage as there are specific cooperative statutes for many human activities, this proximity has confirmed the choice of co-operative status as a possible form of application Of the principles set out in the Faro Convention.

To conclude and put into perspective this process, the Coopérative Hotel du Nord is not a "typical model" of a heritage cooperative because it is first and foremost the expression of a community with its peculiarities, fragilities and riches.

In the long term, the cooperative aims at the status of a European heritage co-operative which will give a European status to the heritage constituted in its content (its undivided reserves) and its identity.

It is a matter of enrolling in a historical process: For some decades these two European creations, the good Inaliénableconstitué by the heritage and the undivided reserve constituted by the cooperatives, are growing the common good in The interest of future generations.

Prosper Wanner, Co-operative manager of the Nord Hotel.

January 2011.

Text of the intervention to the study day of Thursday, 25 November 2010 "Evolution of heritage contexts and representations of patrimony" organised by the general Association of curators of public Collections of France, PACA section (AGCCPF )

Gillian Xeridat: The northern HOtel in the RavinE de la Viste

Hotel du Nord puts on line a proposal of the common editions the translation in English by Gillian Xeridat of the first account of hospitality the ravine of the Viste, written by Christine Breton and Hervé Paraponaris and published in December 2010. The Ravine de la Viste More of a chasm than a place: a noise originating from the depths of a bottomless pit that has no shape, like the beating of a heart that has run amok. The mindless, unrelenting rhythm of the highway never ceases its endless friction on the rocky skin from which only something strange can spring forth. All notions of subtlety, traditions and continuity disappear. The steep cliffs erode into shelters of silence and desire, sheltering the centuries, withholding the past of this place.

— But The bone remains —

The giant of the ravine the scale is impossible. It's a monster. Only a huge being could gain access to the enormous cavity that serves as its shelter. It is dug out of the cliff, a sheer drop in the fresh darkness of the deep gorge on the borderline between fantasy and reality. Who is this giant that guards the pass, leaning on the edge of the plateau of La Viste, his feet in the stream called the Aygalades? The Cyclops seems to be waiting for Ulysses. Who is this being who left so little in his tracks that nobody could even confirm that he existed until one of his teeth was found on the site in the 19th century.

— The giant Bone —

An investigation that lasted 1 500 years to understand the amazing discovery in the gorge we must turn back the clock and go off To Tunisia. In 424, Bishop Augustine published a book called The City of God. In this book he related how a huge "tooth" was found at Utica near Tunis: The tooth was attributed to a "giant" in keeping with the story in the Bible. The same idea was recycled in Europe between the 5th and 17th centuries. Any huge tooth that was found was compared to the Utica findings and was considered as proof that there were giants living on Earth before man. Augustine and the Bible wrote the stories. The proof fitted nicely with the stories. But in 1639 Thomas of Arcos, the Provence born renegade from La Ciotat, found another of these "giant" teeth in the area of Utica. Thomas of Arcos was a free spirit, a man of great curiosity, a cross between a curio collector and an antique dealer. He lived in Tunis as a free Muslim after having been a slave, captured in 1628 by the Pirates. He had doubts and did not classify this giant tooth with quite as much certainty as the Bible. He feels his find to Peiresc, a learned man in Aix-en-Provence. Peiresc decided to send the tooth round to a network of his knowledgeable friends in Europe instead of putting it into a show-case of collector's curiosed "giant tooth". As a result the experts analyzed it and their opinion was that it was in fact an elephant tooth…. This came as a thunderbolt, uncovering 1200 years of repeated western errors. But Peiresc kept quiet about his discovery because about the same time Galileo was thrown into prison in Rome by the Catholic Church because he had dared to demonstrate that the Earth was round, revolving around the sun. The "giant" hypothesis therefore lasted another century; No point in going against the Bible and Saint-Augustin at the same time! Just try and imagine the emotion experienced by the person beside the cave in this gorge at the beginning of the 19th century who found the huge fossilized tooth. … Was this a molar tooth belonging to the supposed giant? A giant that was going to have to return to the book of imaginary beings written by Jorge Luis Borges. A François Rabelais style giant who could perhaps have been the fifth of Sir Thomas Browne "Fabulous Animals". Just Imagine the person who found the tooth holding it in his hand; At that very moment the time between fiction and science stood still.

— Fossilised knowledge —

The Aygalades-Florence Lypsky, architect This time the wise men of Provence were sure that it was a fossilised elephant tooth. They therefore sought to identify it and imagined it to be an Elephas Meridionalis like the one discovered some years previously on the same site. By comparing it with the different sub-species published in 1859 by Lartet, they recognised an Elephas Antiquus described by the paleoanthropologist Hugh Falconer in 1847. This was an Elephas that lived in the tuffs in the cliffs. The body stopped rotting because of the carbon released by the lime in the freshwater that ran off the star hills which engulfed it. All this happened at the beginning of the Quaternary era, between the Pliocene and the Pleistocene. Elephas Antiquus lived in Europe between 1 million years (1 Ma) and 100 000 years before our era in a temperate climate. The Elephas Meridionalis preceded it and founded the mammoth family. The fossilised tooth was found in the tuffs over 150 years ago when Gaston de Saporta was busy studying the flora and Felix Timon David collecting fossils that he found on the Plateau de la Viste, where he lived. Which of the two discovered the tooth? It still in existence today because it was given to the geologist and palaeontologist Philippe matherion in the form of a moulding and he put it into his private collection. He swapped items of his collection with his friend G. de Saporta in the tradition started up by Peiresc and the Provence network and they also went out walking together. Walking and meeting huge animals From the 9th to the 17th October 1864, the French geological Society held a meeting in Marseille. Don't think that its members intended to stay indoor seated in a lecture hall! These Ladies and gentlemen went out every day on field trips on foot towards Fuveau, Cassis, Martigues, along the twenty-four wells of the Nerthe tunnel, across the brambles and the tuffs of the ravine from the Viste or climbed the hillsides equipped with hats, sticks, Shoes and hammers. During This extraordinary itinerant meeting – seven days! – they walked with P. Mathern along the railway tunnel that the engineer Talabot had built sixteen years previously. Mathern had followed with interest the works to pierce the tunnel that ran under the La Nerthe Hillside, from the foothills of the estae to those of Gignac, recording and dating all the geological strata. He also made daily drawings of all the fossils he saw during the four years the work lasted and drew up the longest known paleontological cross-section, covering 4638 meters. The members of the Society were able to inspect this 25-metre long document that has unfortunately disappeared since. In his papers on the hills, Mathern mentions "the bone of an enormous Saurian", the Rhabdodon Priscus, and fossilised dinosaur eggs. He was thus the founding father of our modern "dinosaur-mania"! His impressive work on the Gignac foothills revealed with Maestro the greatest scale of time ever recorded in Provence, ranking from the inferior Cretaceous to the Celts of the Oppidum of the bell just above. In the red clay of the foothills of the Estae, he brought to light fossils such as the jaw-bone of the Rhinoceros minutus. They continued until they reached the Roquefavour site… How I would have loved to walk with this great discoverer! The Society also followed G. de Saporta's discoveries and thus we find ourselves in the Gully de La Viste, on the site where he found Elephas Antiquus. The annual newsletter edited by the Society gives us a written account of his walks. The second series, spanning the years 1844 to 1872, offers us the following report in Volume 21, Page 495: – Session of 15th October 1864. Mr. De Saporta gave at talk on some observations he made on the Quaternary travertine area that crowns the heights of La Viste. "The (fossilised) vegetation, that is not lot older than ours, sheltered the great pachyderms of the Quaternary era and was perhaps even offered asylum to the primitive human beings whose traces were found in the diluvium on the edges of the Somme. This therefore confirms the hypotheses that these tuffs are related to the first establishment of human beings and their tools, defended today by the Prehistorian Eugene Bonifay. It also situates the presence of Man much farther back in time and a little later the text confirms yet another assumption. – In the cave-riddled tuffs in the Aygalades area, among a rich mixture of dicotyledonous leaves, not far from the place where the Society had stopped searching, several teeth of Elephas Antiquus were found lying beside each other-probably the remains of the burial of a complete animal. The presence of Mr. de Saporta on this site just after the discovery enabled him to check the excavation and obtain, although with some difficulty, one of the teeth, which was moulded and examined by Messrs. Lartet and Falconer, who both recognised the Elephas Antiquus without any hesitation. So this means that G. de Saporta was the person who made the molding and one can well imagine him giving it to P. Mathern, who made it the masterpiece of his collection. But Why was the mysterious owner so reluctant? For those who are familiar with the bottom of the ravine, it is obvious that the Society stopped searching at the waterfall close to where the cemetery is today. In that area the tuffs are riddled with caves. At that period two owners shared the site-Mr. De Castellane and Mr. De Forbin Janson, both of whom collected curiosities. The little piece of Elephas Antiquus that was moulded and displayed to the public – thereby founding the reputation of the site – is probably now in the reserves of the Museum. Thanks to the kind cooperation of Anne Marko-Blondel, who is the director of the museum today, the reserves were searched to find the mould to take a photograph.

— The plaster mould of the bone —

An Elephant meets with a motorway In 1940, when the northern highway out of Marseille was built, the Earth-moving machines cut into the cliffs when they crossed the ravine. E. Bonifay, accompanied by the Prehistorians Max Escalon and Henry de Lumley went out to collect samples in an area that was dug out on the side where the "gendarmerie" is today. All the paleontological and archaeological material they found is today inaccessible. It is perhaps in the drawers at the MMSH (Mediterranean Museum of Human Sciences) in Aix-en-Provence. I went off to search for it, rather as if I were a sort of archaeologist digging into the depths of our knowledgeable societies. If Nothing comes of our enquiries, the mould of the molar tooth of Elephas Antiquus will teach us nothing, because the environment in which it was found has disappeared and a plaster moulding cannot be chemically analyzed. To sum it all up in a nutshell, that wonderful find will have become sterile in terms of down-to-earth data; Just another nice object in a curio collection. What a terrible loss in terms of scientific knowledge! At this point in the enquiry nothing has really been proven "for posterity", although Elephas Antiquus does exist in out erudite tradition. There are reams of papers on library shelves, confirming or contradicting the existence of the elephant. A sort of strange fatality seems to interfere with the transmission of prehistoric knowledge in situ in Marseille. All the material from the digs carried out in the cave in the ravine seems to have disappeared, as it has for those in materials near the ESTA. The Christi Cave was closed after a dreadful accident in the corridor leading to it. This just goes to show how inaccessible knowledge can become… I can only see two ways of explaining this unfortunate situation. • The first hypothesis is that Elephas was invented. It may be a popular tradition perpetrating the erudite tradition that started in Tunis 1500 years ago – the tradition of the "Giants" related in all the tourist guide books and scientific works voted to the ravine. In that case the fossilized tooth will become part of a poetic tradition involving fabulous animals and our mistaken imagination, which is also in a way a vector of the past. • The second is that tuffs preserve the microcomponents of the water table which may have been the vector that broughted the tooth that was caught up in a concreteness from elsewhere before it became fossilized there.

— Mistaken traditions —

What do the geologists say? I asked Nadine Gomez, a geologist, who is also a connoisseur in modern art and the curator of the dignified museum, what she thought about the tuffs since she lived near the site as a child. Dialogue: CB. – Your family is from Saint-Louis. Are you familiar with the tuffs? Did this site participate in your vocation to become a geologist? Ng. – My parents lived in Saint-Louis when I was born, but I only stayed there for a few months. My interest in geology comes from the walks I did in the region of Digne where I spent all my holidays with my Grandmother and my sister at the beginning of the Sixties. I came to study the tuffs in the Marseilles basin when I did my DEA (Diploma of Advanced Studies). They cover a geographical area of over 10 km2 between Aubagne and Cap Janet, and are part of a major geological feature, La viste. They are made up of travertine, that is to say sedimentary rocks that were deposited by soft water. I've always loved the toponymic connection between Aygalades (aigues means water in Occitan) and the fact that the whole of this region was geologically built up by river sedimentation. Cb. – How Did you study them? Ng. – We had to take samples at the foot of the high-rise blocks of the social housing development at La Viste, to research for flora in the sediment. Thanks to the fossilized remains of plants in the tuffs we have a fairly clear idea of what the vegetation in the ravine was in the Quaternary era, with pubescent oaks, maples, limes, firs, willows and also plants that are more suited to a hot climate such as Ficus , laurels and even palm trees (Chamœrops humiliations); The latter are species that are more compatible with the discovery of an elephant tooth near the Chateau de La viste cb. – Do you think that the animal really exists? Or is it one of the Giant myths, like the one studied by Peiresc? To find out, she advise me to go to the Geology section of the Palaeontology Museum at the university and read G. de Saporta on the Quaternary tuffs of the Aygalades and La Viste (Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr., 2nd series, T. 21, pages 495-499, l864). Thanks to the geologists Elephas Antiquus reappear in its environment of flora and fauna and human represented by a few chips of prehistoric tools, dating back to the confining of prehistory, in the geological findings in the different layers of palaeontology Explored. On The wall of the museum, that I was not familiar with, there was the skull of an elephant that made me think of the Cyclops and in drawer No. 853, Loïc Velazquez, the head of the museum, shown me some of the exhibits from a private collection of fossils that belong to Timo N-David. They came from the ravine and the La Viste Plateau. In the Quaternary tuffs of the Romani countryside in the Pleistocene era fossilized plants appearing in the stony gangue: Oak, alder, nut and willow leaves and fossilized snails. All This formed the organic environment of Elephas Antiquus. We were now on the comforting pathway to understanding our biological heritage: something that lived on Earth 100 000 before us…

— At last some objects in their environment! —

Did any humans live with the elephant of the Aygalades? Let US explore another pathway. What do the standard scientific tools tell us? The archaeological map of Gaulle contributes another, more optimistic note in its volume on Marseilles: The prehistoric sites in the region of Marseille were thoroughly searched with great enthusiasm at an early stage. » But, what about this molar that was found precisely there? Neither M. Escalon, nor E. Bonifay, or the Prehistorian Jean Courtin, who quoted it in the extract from the archaeological map mentioning the tooth and the elephant ever said exactly where it was found, nor where it is now. To read the writings of these modern scientists all you need to do is to consult the on-line catalogue of the libraries of Marseille or enter their names into the data base. But their articles do not yield anything further, we need to meet the scientists or take a look in the drawers that contain their curios. The authors of the map recognise that "nothing much has been added to the data and no critical work was carried out on Marseille during the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic eras. […] The documentation from the older digs, unfortunately not carried out as strictly as would have been desirable, is now unfortunatelyly scattered, inaccessible and in some cases lost. The studies are mainly focused on the materials found and only superficially touch on the actual purpose of the digs "I thereby understand that this lost data reflects the state of our knowledge. Keep that in mind, because on site this assumption can be checked out for each stratum and forms a sort of continuum. If human tools were found, as E. Bonifay states, then we would have and exceptional site for the foundation of a human settlement. In addition to the tuffs of La viste that geologists from all over the world come and visit, the gully shelters another wonder: "Remains from the inferior Palaeolithic era, which are exceptional in France….." A few chips were reported by E. Bonifay in 1972 in the Travertine (tuffs) in the area of the Aygalades, says the geological map. It is time to wonder why these left-overs from the remains collected in 1940 suddenly turn up thirty years later…. Back to square one of our hunt for the impossible, because the habitat of Elephas Antiquus remains invisible, even on the archaeological map, which quotes references that disappear into thin air immediately afterwards. These few words in passing referring to tools made by human hand would be wonderful if it were possible to check the reference, because this would prove that Man lived at the same time as Elephas Antiquus. Only E. Bonifay, could move our knowledge forwards, if he found the materials or proceeded with the digs requested for the past three years by the local people.

— The bone of the city —

Other discoveries made in the Viste Last week two original cards were found; They were written by Mathern in his own handwriting. They describe: "Elephas antiquus Falconer, 2. A" in the upper right corner; "is not in Gervais" on the left; "Tuffs in Saint-Louis" on the right; "Tuffs in a Viste" on the left. In the centre: the reference of his drawing in the Geological Society Review dated 1859. On the other card: "Elephas meridionalis nesti, 1. A, Gervais 69, Pliocene, La viste, Old Alluvion" in the upper left hand corner, taken from his own article. Once again, more paper but nothing on the object itself! However, we are moving forward because it says that the tuff in La Viste is from Saint-Louis. We are therefore with certainty talking about the valley side and not the opposite slope where the clay quarry is. On the other slope the Elephas named Meridionalis, a far older species, is dated as being from the Pliocene era. I went back to the municipal library to consult the catalogue of Matheron's Palaeontology collection for the Pliocene listed in 1898. The first piece quoted in the chapter on remarkable finds is our Elephas Antiquus. At last, we have the card version of the object: Elephas Antiquus, Falconer and Cautley 1847, Pleistocene tuffs from the Aygalades, plaster mould of a molar tooth. In the inventory on the following line there is another description: Elephas Meridionalis, Nesti, Pliocene, plaster mould of a molar tooth, tuffs from the Chateau de La Viste. » With Two time-points I can make history… These two finds, made over 150 years ago, have over time maintained the confusion between two elephants although the time that separated them can be counted in millions of years! The oldest is the one found near the Château de La Viste. Alas, according to Bonifay, the château in question was not the one located just above the cave, but one that was farther on in the clay quarry between Saint-Louis and Saint-André. It was the former Château des Tours, belonging to Foresta and it disappeared as the quarry was excavated in the nineteen-fifties of our era. The molar tooth fossil can thus be dated back to the Pliocene as the rhinoceros jaw found on the same spot was; That is to say 5 to 2 million years previously as the palaeontologists say. This would be the last part of the Tertiary era, say the geologists, or the very beginning of the inferior Palaeolithic, say the Prehistorians. We haven't even got to a historical era yet and already three different time scales are fighting for the continuity of the site! The very same moment in time with three different names, enough to make you lose all sense of simplicity and continuity! And if Bonifay was mistaken about the chateau? The lack of accuracy in everything connected to these finds means that at this point in the investigation we cannot reject the assumption that Elephas Meridionalis may have been alive at the same time as the younger of the two species: Elephas Antiquus, which would thus Link its habitat to the Pleistocene era, somewhere between 600 000 and 100 000 before bear, that is to say in the Quaternary and inferior Palaeolithic eras. Thus it may well have lived alongside human beings with their tools, the chips of limestone found before the Second World War and…. Don't forget….. We are still searching….

— Tools made of stone and bone —

Categories of knowledge and disappearance of knowledge On the borderline between the three categories of knowledge we have just reviewed stands the ravine. We know that the waters are no longer just those that flow from the existing springs and streams but include those that formed the rocks before Man appeared. Did the human beings who invented and used the word "Aygalades" to say who they were and where they were from know that these rocks were made from fossilised water that had deposited sediment over a period of time? When They are formed, rocks write there own history and a geologist knows exactly how to read it with a microscope. It is also water that has hewn out the landscape here and continues to shape it. The giant cave and its environment close by illustrate a temperate period before the following glaciation. Thus, when Joseph Repelin, the geologist gave a reading to the Geographic Society of Marseille in 1902 on a woolly mammoth's tooth he discovered-an Elephas Primigenius-younger than our animal, he used the following landmark to portray the era before the mammoths: " The temperature was warm in Provence during the Quaternary era, which was the time of Elephas Antiquus when the tuffs were deposited in the Aygalades. The backdrop of this landscape was born symbolically too during this period. In the bottom of the ravine runs a stream, a miniature soft-water memory. The vertical walls of the gorge were fashioned out of the limestone layers by a more powerful river. It slowly eroded the harder limestone layers, and then when it came into contact with the softer tuffs it hollowed out all the caves and shelters we can still see today in the cliffs. Some have disappeared under the rubble from the highway or the factories built in the valley. Above, the La Viste Plateau is also full of subterranean's cavitis hollowed out in the tuffs. This is a little piece of landscape that witnesses to the passing of time…. A hypothesis is starting to take shape and the fossil sites will once again be brought back into the continuum by the religious function of the people who live there…

— The bone of religion…

Christine Breton, historian and heritage curator

Text by Hervé Paraponaris: "Josette Leukaemia" I am the son of Yvette and Max. Like a lot of other immigrant children my first name is very French. This is something I have in common with both my brothers, Claude and Alain. I have never heard any other language than French spoken at home. My roots are far away, despite the fact that I grew up with my maternal grandparents Marie and Céléstin. Marie was Sardinian, from Sassari and Celestine was Italian, although actually he was from Naples. They arrived in France at the beginning of the 20th century, separately; Both were children of communists fleeing from Italy. Mary arrived with her family, ten people in all, father, mother, brothers and sisters. As a child she had very little education, so she learned French looking after her bothers and sisters. She was very good at mental arithmetic. They were all lodged together at Les Aygalades, in the chateau. They were "domestic staff", which was neither a job nor even a status, it was just a means of survival-doing all the household tasks and cleaning to be sure that they had a place to live in the meantime. It was only a lot later, once she was no longer a teenager that Mary was able to think about her emancipation. She met Castro, a handsome young plumber and roofer from Naples who had emigrated from Italy like her. When They were married they moved into a home in Gasparini, in the educators, just to the north of the village of Aygalades. Before the birth of their two daughters Castro started up his own business 11 from rue René d'anjou. At that address he had his workshop and a little place to live in. My grandfather was an incredible character, working 24 hours a day. My grandmother helped him. She was small and could easily slip into the wells and septic tanks to empty out the sludge. They saved up some money to buy a house and set up a real home of their own at last. They finally did so in 1930, first at 45 rue René D'Anjou where they bought a tiny two-room flat, then little by little, room after room, over the years they bought the whole of that magnificent two-floor house in the village complete with a courtyard and a little terrace. My mother and her sister were born there. My mother met my father, Max at a ball, the "Hermitage Ball", which was the Mecca of dancing at the time-the famous ball of the Aygalades. My father and his family lived at the poop, not far away, before they moved to the Aygalades. Another form of immigration, another port of call. They were married at number 45. They lived at number 45, sharing the house with my grandparents, they had their three boys their, sharing some wonderful happy moments and also some dreadful misfortunes. Rue René d'anjou was seething with people when my father died. All the people from the shipyard came along and queued up to embrace my mother and assured her that they would never forget him, telling her how much he had counted for them. I was eight and I didn't want any of that. My mother broke into sobs at each brace and I pushed them away with my little arms to stop the torture as quickly as possible. This is how I have come to understand the fact that my mother has Alzheimer's. How can one possibly have memories from the past after so many "thermonuclear" shock-waves? How Can you remember things when they have so many nightmares attached? I don't know of any memory, even a very selective one that could shield itself from so much sadness and lost happiness. She had to face the worst thing that could happen to her at the age of forty; She lost her sun and Guiding Light. She faced the future without flinching, wearing widow's weeds with resignation. She raised her three boys who became educated adults and like her mother had done in her time, she fought to keep the house, her heritage. It was a place of many wonderful moments and also of dramatic events. She never left it until she died. She stuck to it like a fruit on a tree, never taking heed of the birds of prey who would probably have liked their little taste of honey. It was a very nice location. Yesterday she looked pulled. She didn't feel well. She felt dizzy and sick. Until recently she was just "losing her wits" as they say. Now I really feel that she is losing her legendary strength and this may herald the beginning of the end. She is the only parent I have left. I shall be an orphan once she is gone. The difficult task of looking after the house will be mine. Once I thought I would turn it into a hotel or more exactly into a community centre to shelter widows like my mother. Women, spouses of the industry of Marseille-those who suffer in silence, their ears tuned in to RMC awaiting the next news bulletin announcing the explosion of a tanker flying a flag of convenience. Learning that your husband is dead via a radio broadcast, or almost, is something that could make you hate the world at large. But that didn't happen. As the daughter of immigrants she thought with a certain amount of fatality that she was here as a guest. It seemed so obvious. This morning I found her sitting in front of a portrait of her sister Josette, who was not quite twenty when she died of leukaemia. When I turned around I saw a second identical photo of Josette. I was troubled by this and asked her why she had brought out two pictures and her answer was that she found her expression sad on the first but much happier on the second. What could I say? I asked her if I could take one away to draw it, which I did, to deal with these discrepancies in perception that she now has more and more frequently. Hervé Paraponaris, artist

Texts

  • HospitalitY Stories N ° 1
  • Common editions
  • N ° ISBN 978-2-9534899-2-7
  • Christine Breton, historian and heritage curator/Hervé Paraponaris, artist
  • Translation: Gillian Xeridat
  • Number of copies printed: 500 copies
  • Printed in December 2010 with the support of CCI-9 Avenue Paul Héroult, on their printing press ZI La Delorme, F-13015 Marseille
  • Legal Registration December 2010

The Hotel du Nord is in an area that has remains "nameless", as if it were a blank spot on the map, belonging to a town that has no founding history, with no gate to enter and no centre to stop and wander round – only a hospital. It is the hotel of a town that counts 100 000 inhabitants, in the middle of a wasteland, tacked on to Marseille, the port-city that supported the industrial fabric of a former colonial republic called France-part of the post-war reconstruction and the thirty Glorious ". It is a city with a slant, made up of a series of lively, working class neighbourhoods located in the northern part of Marseille and it surrounding villages. In all these villages, over the ages the inhabitants have developed their own special way of working and living together, their own way of remembering history and telling stories from the past as a form of verbal hospitality; The Hotel of the North is an expression of this. As a scattered network of guest houses, it tells the story of those who drop in to stay and their hosts. The name also includes a publishing program and this book is one of its chapters. Each of the books left in the rooms, seeks to tell its reader more about the hospitality offered by the place the guest found it in. If living somewhere is telling a story, the foundation stories are as many tools that enable us to understand our life in society; Nothing that you create can possibly last if you do not go back to the history of the community it belongs to. KEY page 6 drawing of objects from his collection, that have now disappeared, ordered by Nicolas Peiresc. In Gaston Godard, the fossil Proboscideans of Utica (Tunisia), a key to The ' giant ' controversy, from Saint Augustine (424) to Peiresc (1632), geological Society, London, 2009, v. 310, pages 67-76. * Letter of 25 April 1630, Osman Arcos to Aycard de Toulon on the discovery and Letter of 15 March 1631, Arcos to Peiresc, dispatch and acknowledgement of receipt, in the correspondents of Peiresc, T. 15, P. Tamizey de Larroque, Algiers, Jourdan, 1889. And on Osman of Arcos, censorship and inquisition at the beginning of the17e century Janet Tolbertism, ambiguity of the conversion, Journal of Early Modern History, 2009, v. 13, No. 1, pages 1-24. Page 10 Previous page and above, Marseilles Museum of Natural History, Palais Longchamp. Page 11 Mr. Lartet, on the dentition of Proboscids fossils, Bulletin of the French geological Society, Paris, 1859, T. 16, 2nd series, pages 500-501, plate 15, Figure 10: Elephas Meridionalis and Figure 11: Elephas Antiquus © shared documentation Department of The University of Provence. Page 14 P. Mathern (1807-1899) belonging to the network of scientists that Napolean IIIrd encouraged in Marseilles at the beginning of the colonial period. The collection is mainly made up of items from Provence including 40 000 samples and over 2 000 new species registered; Since it was purchased in 1902 it has been part of the inventory of the Museum of Natural History of Marseille. Page 18 At The Museum of Palaeontology, Faculty of Science, Marseille. Page 42 Marseille lacustrine. At the Museum of Paleontology, Faculty of Science, Marseille. Page 46 G. de Saporta and P. Mathern published a large format book together in 1861 in Zurich: Notes on the tertiary areas of the south-east of France, containing a stratigraphic description covering the oldest to the most modern times enabling us to date the discovery At the Aygalades as 1860: Above The clays of the Marseilles basin we found an uninterrupted succession of lacustrian deposits withholding successively Equus Antiquus, Elephas Meridionalis and higher Still, in the tuffs at La Viste, another elephant, Elephas Antiquus. »

Wildproject publishes an excerpt from the first North Hotel hospitality account

Wildproject, the online journal of Cultural Ecology published in February 2011 the article "Philippe Mathern and the tunnel of the Nerthe are the founders of the Dinosauro-mania." This text is extracted from "at the ravine of the Viste", first title of the collection "Tales of hospitality of the Hotel du Nord" by authors Christine Breton and Hervé Paraponaris, published in the joint editions in January 2011. "Think with the feet" Issue 9 February 2011. There's a thousand ways to walk. But whether she is a pilgrim, Conqueror, Runaway, nomad it is a cyclical and seasonal march, the March draws a territory, and is a powerful means of travel, beyond its seemingly modest pace. Between leisure, art, philosophy and spirituality, and on the occasion of the creation of the GR2013 in Marseille, the first metropolitan Hiking trail, a few trails between city and nature.

Christine Breton and Prosper Wanner: Heritage Communities: Active principle of sustainable development

Preamble This report was validated by the plenary Assembly of 5 February 2009 of the Departmental Council for consultation of Bouches-du-Rhône. Download the report. Introduction: This report is part of the collective thinking movement launched by the CDC in 2007 to understand and understand the principles of sustainable development and their applications to the territories of the Department. This report brings heritage lighting, it results from numerous round-trips between the already existing citizen practices in the Department and the framework of law newly opened by the Faro Convention of 2005:» Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on the value of cultural and natural Heritage for society. You can see in Appendix 1. This report proposes to consider the natural and cultural heritages of the territories of the Bouches-du-Rhône department as a living and founding citizen of any sustainable development process. This report does not go beyond the theoretical, sometimes complex, and yet at the heart of the commitments of heritage communities in the face of economic, social and tourist issues: the discourse of cultural tourism consistently affirms that Tourists are increasingly interested in heritage, "authentic" destinations and multiple cultural activities. This statement, issued in the commercial language, accompanies and justifies the implementation of many tourism projects presented as the future "local development engines". The problem is that the reading of attendance figures and the observation of non-' prestigious ' cultural places and territories, the vast majority of tourist offerings, is totally opposed to this institutional and political optimism. The discourse of cultural tourism does not seem rational in relation to the market criteria and the financial purposes it claims. "What is sought by tourism policies – and undoubtedly by tourists, is then not an alteration, a difference, but what makes it possible to represent oneself, by identification or differentiation." The consequences are that cultural tourism is not a modality of exchange and discovery of the other as postulated by its proponents, but rather a deficit of thought of otherness and an unthink of exchange. ("Identity in the Mirror of tourism" PhD thesis sociology, Saskia Cousin, 2003). 1 – The natural and cultural heritage of the territories of the Bouches-du-Rhône department will be as many resources for sustainable development as there will be heritage communities to establish and sustain them. * Evolution of the concept of heritage: the word heritage is used in this report in the French sense. We inherit a set of public visual and written forms that base power and crystallize the social body. It should not be forgotten that Aix was the home and cradle. Many private collectors, all from the sphere of the Parliament of Provence, whose Peiresc, from the end of the 16th century, helped to found and the first public collections and the royalty of divine right that was invented. One of them, P.A. Rahmanadia de Bagarris, collector Aix, of noble Robe, was chosen by Henri IV to be the founder and intendant of his collections of antiques and his Cabinet of medals, circa 1598. He insisted on the advantage of establishing public treasures and recalled that a prince was obliged to preserve the monuments of the glory of his predecessors. He has written a book that is still topical: "The need for the use of medals in currencies". What image do you hold in your hand every day when you make your deal? He's the first public curator. Still today, this built public continuity relies on us in the unseen. After the religious and divine right, the Republican state continued to occupy this place in our collective imaginary, thus constituting an unspoken heritage community. P. LEGENDRE who created dogmatic anthropology dismantles This process and shows "what the West does not see from the West". Title at Mille and One Nights 2004. * The public service has the responsibility of the public treasury in this French tradition, but the new reality of the state obliges us to rebase the principles of local and European policies. That is the current issue. Heritage is an active principle that we still collectively have responsibility for. Be careful so the heritages are not resources like the others. We propose in this report the basics of alternative management which could give rise to opinions for the Assembly of elected representatives. * The challenge of sustainable development as an alternative and citizen management of Territories and heritages: In a previous report of the Departmental Council of consultation, in 2006, we advocated the integrated approach to heritage to make Department a pilot in the application of the principles developed by the Council of Europe and updated in the Faro convention which we recall in the annex. We have an active tool to found specific local territories integrated into the European dimension and the process of its construction. Still need to know how to use it!! These principles are too far from French traditions and continuity is broken. So we have to translate them into sustainability. We have several local strengths to do that. A – Local strengths rapid state of play in 2008: At the general level:-The growing awareness of public opinion on sustainable development is timidly translated into action, whether we are challenged as a citizen, professional or simple Consumer. -This change in behaviour, so often highlighted as fundamental, represents for each one (r) cultural evolution. It is not just a matter of having the right tools, a certain number of recipes already exist, but of wanting to seize it. Our relationship with our environment, whether human, natural or technical, goes through culture. Just like the link between generations, the foundation of sustainable development. -Cultural heritages, which are not taken into account today in sustainable development policies, are on the move to be the active principle. We then consider them not only as a common good to be preserved for future generations, but also as one of the only ones able today to accompany a cultural change of this nature. -Heritage has a dual cultural and economic quality that would make it a catalyst for collective process, which is indispensable for sustainable development. It can be this "lowest common denominator" between sectors, disciplines and logics that are difficult to rub shoulders with. A common good shared by different uses or valuations: economic, symbolic, ecological, historical, social, etc. -This new ambition for both the elect and the heritage curators is perceived as a risk-taking first. And it is a real risk taking to move from an outlet so well identified public heritage policies to this new outlet where everything seems "to be built". But what are the risks of not taking that risk? Heritage is not a commodity. Today, conditions seem to come together to accompany a risk-taking. At the departmental level: A detailed study on the state of the department's assets has just been delivered by the Regional heritage Agency; Its text is available in Appendix 2. B-The most symbolic value based on shared management in another CDC report, presented in November 2006: "Departmental heritage: Common good and economic exchange", the CDC was already advocating immediate applications in this direction. It was published and disseminated in the field of heritage professionals by their association: the AGCCPF. The book is available in library libraries and at the CDC under the title "Shared valuation of heritage". Rapid state of play in 2008: At the general level: cultural and natural heritages are already at work in the new processes of value creation. They become the most important competitive values to stand out in an increasingly global and virtual economy. Heritage has also become an economic lever for state debt. The new Intangible Heritage Agency of the state the FIPA and the recent exceptional valorisation of the "Louvre" brand are there to testify. This increased recovery, certainly risky, is also the opportunity for the world of culture to take language with the economic world, often perceived as antagonist. The local authorities, the TPE, the SMEs, the associations, in short what makes the local economy, has as much need of the heritage to be anchored locally and to find a room for economic manoeuvre conducive to sustainable development. (role of smaller common denominator). Public policy frameworks are also structured at national level: the state, as part of the modernization of public services, has built a battery of more than a thousand performance indicators. They concern all public policies culture, health, economics, etc. and are apprehended from the point of view of the citizen, the user and the taxpayer. Communities are increasingly inspired at the local level. So many benchmarks to follow the risk taking, compare its performance, draw on the balance sheets and know whether it remains compatible with national policies, or even European. This possibility is offered by the Organic law relating to the financial laws of 2001, the LOLF. (See our annexes). Legislation that is increasingly binding on the cultural heritage and its environment, translating in fact the shift from an essentially cultural approach of heritage sites to an approach taking into account the environment of the site and its management Decentralised. At the departmental level: civil society supports the ratification process of the Council of Europe's Faro convention, both at the Professional level by the association AGCCPF PACA and more general by CDC 13 (report 2006). Public policy framework indicators are structured at the local level through the work of the regional heritage agency: Mr Parodi, president of the H.C. will make its contribution at the end of June in the No. 5 of the agency's notebooks. 179 942 ha are under patrimonial jurisdiction at the departmental level: 40 Registered sites (104 680 ha), 68 sites classified (26,200 ha), their approaches (48 120 ha) and 12 ZPPAUP (942 ha) – Source SDAP. 5 agreements for the transfer of monuments belonging to the State to communes pursuant to Article 97 of the Law of 13 August 2004 were signed, i.e. 10% of the national (41) – Source Senate October 2008. 10 years of experimentation in field application of the Council of Europe's recommendations within the framework of the European Integrated Heritage mission have enabled the emergence of 5 active heritage communities and the structuring of a methodology that Already schooled at European level (even annex 40xVenezia). C-The right to heritage an update of dogmatic invisible springs. Rapid state of play in 2008: At the general level: the absence or weakness of the existing repositories concerning the cooperation of the Conservatives with the private sector weakens the construction of conventions to regulate the relations of forces or even possible Conflicts of interest between public and private. The right to cultural heritage emerges at European level. It makes it possible to envisage more serenely a regulatory framework adapted to the cooperation of the Conservatives with the private: associations, companies, individuals, etc. By proposing to pass each of the status of "beneficiary" of heritage to that of "entitled", it proposes a new regulatory framework. Private partners are recognized as partners, not just potential customers, suppliers or benefactors. The heritage is public and remains public. Co-operative status is increasingly becoming a framework for private public cooperation. In a previous report of the departmental Consultation Council in 2006, we called on the Department to continue its support to the cooperative movement and in particular to the development of public-private cooperation, particularly within CICS. Since then, our region has been the first place for the number of cooperative corporations of collective interest (CICS). CICS associate multiple actors around a single project that focuses on its outcome rather than short-term profit-seeking. CICS ' business lines are human services, the environment, culture, local development (source our region N ° 199). At the departmental level: heritage institutions and their elected officials are beginning to be sensitized to the principles of sustainability integrating heritage communities. The necessary methodological revolution is underway to share the former public monopoly and to make it a public service of scientific accompaniment. The Association of curators of the public collections of France offers on its website under the heading "Topical question" concrete examples in progress: www.ateliermuseal.net. The practice of free software already widely used in the citizen networks of the Department promotes this new shared value. See appendix 3 for J.C. Spoiler's text on the principles of free. 2 – First conclusions for a proposal for an opinion the difficulty is to move forward on all three fronts in a collaborative way: public/private shared management, monitoring framework (indicators), (re) updating of the common law. One cannot do without the other. Cooperation without clear objectives is often limited to a display strategy. And the pursuit of common objectives without a regulatory framework lasts only the time of the founders, or less. If the relationship to the client or beneficiary is sufficiently marked, that of public/private cooperation requires more. The recognition of the participatory approach as one of the fundamentals of sustainable development strategies, including that of the state, and the new Faro convention are two points of support for tackling the task. A-collaborative work proposals within the CDC, the emergence of social value since the presentation of the framework, we have sought some heritage practices of sustainable Cooperation in the Department and in each case the angle Analysis focused on the relationship between public professionals and private contractors (SES) such as a SA (limited company), an association or an individual company. The realization of portraits of heritage cooperation is being published by the network of curators of the region (AGCCPF). This consisted initially of going to see on the sites, to meet these people, to collect their testimony and the data available. Then, from this material, a diagnosis was made from three angles:-The first on economic valuation or otherwise said the interest for the entrepreneur,-the second on the efficiency and effectiveness of this cooperation for the heritage,-and The last one on the modalities of contracting which it was possible to pose between the company and the public heritage institution. In what measures does a cooperative approach between a conservative and a company perform well? Is it compatible with the performance targets set by the state through the LOLF? Does it strengthen the company? Does it help to strengthen a sustainable development approach for the company? The three examples chosen by the AGCCPF PACA attest to the effective existence of cooperation between conservatives and enterprises favourable to sustainable development. They voluntarily illustrate the three traditional axes of sustainable development: the environment, the social and the economy. As they illustrate the diversity of possible entrances: a national museum, a departmental museum and a communal mission – an association, an independent and a public limited company – a work of art, a heritage object and a historical monument. The conclusions of the diagnostics are encouraging: cooperation is interesting for both parties. Each of these cooperation is efficient – or thrifty – for the museum and the company. They are an effective way to accompany the realization of the museum's missions – improving the accessibility of heritage, intervention in rural areas or in sensitive urban areas. They are even effective in terms of the targets set by the LOLF to museums for 2010. Finally, they strengthen the economic actors in their choice to be enrolled in sustainable development. Cooperation is done with a large part of civil society – associations, companies, collectives, residents. The fragility of these cooperations is structural: these are sustainable development initiatives that are not sustainable. Cooperation is based more on trust than on contractual regulation of reports. In this context, it can be difficult to pass a course of development, to go beyond the founders or simply to transfer these experiences except to find an identical context. A first conclusion to these portraits is perhaps the identification of this site which seems to be a priority for these innovations, these experiments and these investigations to emerge a framework of common law. B – Experience elsewhere in EUROPE: to make the concept of heritage community understood we have shifted to a port city and Delta: Venice. We have retained a heritage and sustainable citizen experience that of the 40XVenezia. The 40xVenezia (Quarantine for Venice) is a proposal movement that seeks to make available to Venice its own plural experiences of citizens 40xVenezia has found a formidable tool of expression through its social network (or NING) , an online discussion instrument to which it is sufficient to register by giving its name, a photograph and a profile course to be immediately projected in an immense telematic agora (more than 1500 users to date) in which it is possible to Know the movement and participate in its activities (www.40xVenezia.it). Currently the 40xVenezia movement is committed to promoting knowledge of the Council of Europe's cultural Convention initialled in Faro in October 2005 (in the process of ratification). He made a translation in Italian language to promote a citizen awareness of the significance of the cultural heritage. . A working group has been set up to support this right on the ground. For this reason the 40xVenezia retain that the Faro Convention, which stresses the importance of the "right to cultural heritage", can offer a fundamental support to better interpret, use, preserve and revive the meaning of the cultural dimension of Venice, concerning just as much the relationship with its own citizens-the "heritage community"-that more broadly the one with the world that comes into contact with this community. On the example of the methodology of the heritage ballads created in Marseille, one of the first cities in Europe to have committed itself to make known to its own citizens the Convention, two Venetian heritage ballads were carried out in 2008. See: www.40xvenezia.it C-we propose on the basis of these concrete examples five co-operative opinions arising from these field APPLICATIONS, to be discussed in committee A-The first opinion aims to make more explicit the interest of the entrepreneur who cooperates in Valuing its heritage resource and the one designated as a common good. We see in the examples that he is neither a customer, nor a supplier, nor a patron of the patrimony but the partner of a joint project. How does he find his account? How does this cooperation strengthen its position? We could advocate an extension of the frameworks of indicators by taking into account the existence of private interests (associations, companies, individuals) in the management of the heritage that they remain to name and evaluate. The Regional heritage Agency, the Ministry of Finance via the FIPA or the promotion of PPPs (private public partnerships) could be asked to do so. It would be a measure of civil society's interest in contributing to shared management of heritage. (B) The second opinion is intended to measure cooperation from the point of view of public heritage policies. That is, the ability to achieve the objectives corresponding to the missions of general interest inherent in the cooperation project. In order to be able to compare the efficiency of the cooperative process with other experiences and the target set by the state for the years to come, the indicators are first recovered within the LOLF and integrated into departmental departments. (C) The third opinion concerns the effectiveness of cooperation. It is a question of looking at the means deployed and the results set. Or said more simply to evaluate the value for money. Always with the prospect of being able to compare the effectiveness of the cooperative process at European and national level, LOLF is reused as well as existing territorial measures such as ZPPAUP. How do these cooperation contribute to maintaining a high level of public service in a framework of control of public expenditure? (D) This fourth opinion concerns the involvement of members of civil society (companies, associations, individuals, etc.), on issues relating to heritage and their levels of contracted. This opinion of democratic governance requires a radical change in the categories of knowledge. Heritage leaves the context of education for sustainable development. This implies a large reform of the administrative machinery that falls well since the public debate on the modernisation of the public service was officially launched on 1 October 2007. The CDC could thus participate in the elaboration of their white paper (see annexed article). It requires a patrimonial right (framework for action and regulation) and therefore the application of the text of the Council of Europe's Faro convention on Bouches-du-Rhône by a symbolic signature until the state does so. In this same movement, the department can announce the start of an experimental Agenda 21 on the heritage of the department. This would be the beginning of the process and the recognition of potential partners so motivated. E-Propose the experimental implementation of article 11 of the Faro Convention at the departmental level; "Article 11: Organisation of public responsibilities in the field of cultural heritage". In the management of cultural heritage, the Parties undertake: to promote an integrated and well-informed approach to government action in all sectors and at all levels; To develop legal, financial and professional frameworks that allow for combined action by public authorities, experts, owners, investors, businesses, non-governmental organizations and society Civil To develop innovative practices for the cooperation of public authorities with other stakeholders; D. To respect and encourage voluntary initiatives complementary to the Government's mission; E. To encourage non-governmental organizations concerned with heritage conservation to intervene in the public interest.